thorough research of both ops has to be done before choosing which is correct for your own personal needs, alot of people dont have the full facts when they decide whats best for them, the old perception still comes in to the chain of thought with banding thats it going to be there there " magic cure " or "quick fix" , ive spoken to quite alot of people that are not happy with there bands as they had the beliefs the weight came off fast ect, in reality banding just is not like that, the 2 main complaints i hear of is
1. why am i not loosing weight quickly
2. im compensating eating a small healthy meal with choc or any other slider foods as i feel deprived.
no2 is the biggest one for most people, if they say they not coping with real food then thats wrong as whats actually happening is the bands doing its job and ppl are eating a larger portion than they should be and vomiting as a result and there for feel deprived as they not used to the lesser "volume" intake, slider foods will go down in a large quantity and if substituted for 1 small portion of heathly nutritious foods it will stop weight loss. if anyone is experiencing these difficulties then i strongly advise a banding councilor to help come to terms with these habbits and address the band in the correct manner.
these comments thats are commonly made after banding has taken place is generally through lack of research into banding and research into life with banding after the op.
i dont mean to be harsh, but i think ive been honest in my comments in this post.
Great post Liz...
What you have stated here is precisely why I chose bypass over band. I know that a bypass will give me much greater restriction of what I can eat, and the quantities I can eat from day 1.
Like Silversurfer said, I cant understand why people don't do enough research before their op. If they did, they would realise that they will still be hungry with a band until the right level of restriction is reached which could be many months after the op.